Skip to main content

The Grauniad reports that, according to the Snowden documents, the GCHQ has been naughty indeed, tapping into webcam chats and saving images in bulk.

Britain's surveillance agency GCHQ, with aid from the US National Security Agency, intercepted and stored the webcam images of millions of internet users not suspected of wrongdoing, secret documents reveal.

GCHQ files dating between 2008 and 2010 explicitly state that a surveillance program codenamed Optic Nerve collected still images of Yahoo webcam chats in bulk and saved them to agency databases, regardless of whether individual users were an intelligence target or not.

In one six-month period in 2008 alone, the agency collected webcam imagery – including substantial quantities of sexually explicit communications – from more than 1.8 million Yahoo user accounts globally. [emphasis mine]

While this might reveal I possess an unhealthy amount of cynism regarding our elected luminaries, bastions of integrity and guardians of democracy (unhealthily spying-obsessed) politicians and their valuable and noble underlings (spymasters), I fail to see how collecting large amounts of images of random people keeps us safe from terrorists. I do, however, suspect that this is a really good way to obtain kompromat to be saved in case a person snagged up in the surveillance network ever turns out to be in need of discrediting.

Seriously, read the whole thing. In my view, there are two lessons to be learnt from this: (i) Internet use is pretty much becoming a black-tie event, and (ii) cybersex is probably a really bad idea, if you care about third parties sneaking a peek.

Okay, the system is supposed to be used for facial recognition of terrorism suspects and criminals:

The system, eerily reminiscent of the telescreens evoked in George Orwell's 1984, was used for experiments in automated facial recognition, to monitor GCHQ's existing targets, and to discover new targets of interest. Such searches could be used to try to find terror suspects or criminals making use of multiple, anonymous user IDs.
But there's got to be a better way to track them than this, particularly because of a very obvious problem, which anyone who's ever surfed the internet with safe search turned off can immediately think of:
The documents also chronicle GCHQ's sustained struggle to keep the large store of sexually explicit imagery collected by Optic Nerve away from the eyes of its staff, though there is little discussion about the privacy implications of storing this material in the first place. emphasis mine
I know that the following truism holds:

While it could be argued that the fact that the spooks might decide to ogle me could be considered a compliment on my appearance, I think they should pay for or torrent their porn, just like the rest of us.

 

Poll

Do you have a problem with this, citizens?

73%11 votes
6%1 votes
6%1 votes
0%0 votes
13%2 votes

| 15 votes | Vote | Results

EMAIL TO A FRIEND X
Your Email has been sent.
You must add at least one tag to this diary before publishing it.

Add keywords that describe this diary. Separate multiple keywords with commas.
Tagging tips - Search For Tags - Browse For Tags

?

More Tagging tips:

A tag is a way to search for this diary. If someone is searching for "Barack Obama," is this a diary they'd be trying to find?

Use a person's full name, without any title. Senator Obama may become President Obama, and Michelle Obama might run for office.

If your diary covers an election or elected official, use election tags, which are generally the state abbreviation followed by the office. CA-01 is the first district House seat. CA-Sen covers both senate races. NY-GOV covers the New York governor's race.

Tags do not compound: that is, "education reform" is a completely different tag from "education". A tag like "reform" alone is probably not meaningful.

Consider if one or more of these tags fits your diary: Civil Rights, Community, Congress, Culture, Economy, Education, Elections, Energy, Environment, Health Care, International, Labor, Law, Media, Meta, National Security, Science, Transportation, or White House. If your diary is specific to a state, consider adding the state (California, Texas, etc). Keep in mind, though, that there are many wonderful and important diaries that don't fit in any of these tags. Don't worry if yours doesn't.

You can add a private note to this diary when hotlisting it:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from your hotlist?
Are you sure you want to remove your recommendation? You can only recommend a diary once, so you will not be able to re-recommend it afterwards.
Rescue this diary, and add a note:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary from Rescue?
Choose where to republish this diary. The diary will be added to the queue for that group. Publish it from the queue to make it appear.

You must be a member of a group to use this feature.

Add a quick update to your diary without changing the diary itself:
Are you sure you want to remove this diary?
(The diary will be removed from the site and returned to your drafts for further editing.)
(The diary will be removed.)
Are you sure you want to save these changes to the published diary?

Comment Preferences

Subscribe or Donate to support Daily Kos.

Click here for the mobile view of the site